[144] A arte segundo Munch
Art emerges from joy and pain. Mostly from pain. It grows from human life. Is art a description of this life - of its motion. Should it show the various pleasures, the various sorrows? Or should one simply see flowers, whose character, type and vibration are determined by joy and pain.
Art is the opposite of nature. Art is sovereign in its own kingdom. Art governs nature and discards that which it does not control. Art is na autonomous kingdom which is also part of the kingdom of nature. Art helkps itself to the vast kingdom of nature and conquers it - secretes superfluous art, as in the desire for crystallisation. Needs form - boundaries. Nature is art's first aid.
Artists of this country. Poets - those sensitive phonographs - they have the great anda painful ability to record the emanations - sent out by society. This gives the poets power - a condensed extract. If na artist is chased away from his country - that country also chases away - a fully charged electric force.
Artists of this country. Poets - those sensitive phonographs - they have the great anda painful ability to record the emanations - sent out by society. This gives the poets power - a condensed extract. If na artist is chased away from his country - that country also chases away - a fully charged electric force.
(POUL E. TØJNER (2003). Munch in His Own Words. Munique. Prestel Verlag)
Nunca había leído teorías de Muncho. Tiene que ver mucho con su obra.
Durante un tiemppo, antes de crear mi blog, llevaba el detalle de El Grito como icono en Internet. Después lo cambié a la Dánae de Klimt, para no regodearme en el dolor. Y cuando escribo, intento disciplinarme para hacerlo a diario, pero tengo que reconocer que sí, que el sufrimiento (a veces, la emoción), saca las palabras de mí, mucho más habitualmente de lo que quisiera.
(Muy bella instalación. Muy terapéutica)
Blue Thing
» Enviar um comentário